Compare top-rated contractor providers in Converse. Profiles include verified reviews, service details, and direct contact options.
From $50
Up to $500
Open 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM
At IES Residential in Converse, we specialize as contractors, electricians, and HVAC professionals, tackling a diverse range of residential projec…
Spotted an error? Let us know
We show only active businesses that pass moderation. Results are specific to Converse and nearby service areas, and inactive profiles are removed to keep the list current.
Ratings and reviews come from customers who used the service. Compare contractor pros in Converse by experience, responsiveness, and value before you reach out.
Filter by neighborhood, check locations on the map, and find providers close to home or work in Converse. Listings are refreshed regularly — August 2026.
Find verified contractor providers in cities across the United States. Each city page lists active businesses with reviews, contact details, and current offers.
Looking for contractor in Converse? This page lists verified local providers with ratings, reviews, and contact options. We show active businesses only — profiles are moderated and updated by owners.
Compare pros by experience, price range, and customer feedback. Many providers offer free estimates or same-day service for common requests. Use filters and the map to find someone close to your address.
Yes. Browsing businesses, reading reviews, and comparing providers is free for everyone. Business owners can create a basic listing at no cost.
Every profile goes through moderation before it appears in search. We check that the business is real, active, and matches the category it claims. Inactive listings are hidden automatically.
Start with ratings and recent reviews, then compare services offered, location, and response time. Contact two or three providers to get quotes before making a decision.
Yes. Create a free business profile to reach local customers searching for your category. You can update services, photos, and contact details anytime.
Business owners update their own profiles. Our team also refreshes hub pages and removes inactive listings so search results stay current.
Outstanding experience working with IES. Michael explained everything in detail. The whole project was completed in 1 day and looks great!! Saved $100’s on monthly electric bill!! Highly recommend IES!!
"IES was the best choice" David N. & Juan did an excellent job troubleshooting my 12 year-old 4600 KW solar system, updating some components and bringing it up to standards as if it were new. I'm very pleased with their work, knowledge and customer care
Overall, system quality is good, and the services provided by IES were good as well. -So why the 2-starts instead of 5? I didn’t particularly appreciate how the system was presented in terms of numbers and expectations. Basically, what was presented was misleading. -Why is the information presented to clients misleading? In simple terms, any house in the US (or I should say the world) runs on AC power, but the system is presented and advertised in DC power. Note that companies offer their systems in DC Power. Also, they do present (on paper only) the AC Power output after you sign the initial contract. -Why is it essential to run the numbers with the max AC Power output and not DC? In simple terms, the max AC Power output is limited (clipped) by the inverter’s efficiency or the inverter’s max AC Power output, whichever is less. So with this being said, your panels could be producing 340W DC, but the AC Power output could be 290W AC because of the max power output of the inverter (295W AC Max). -How has this impacted my system? My system was presented to me as a 7.82 kW DC system (23 panels of 340W). All numbers were presented using the DC Power number, numbers such as how much the system could produce in a year (11,382kWh), how much offset I was going to generate (64.93%), etc. After the system was installed, I expected an AC Power constant peak output of something close to 7.59kW due to the inverter’s efficiency. But, to my surprise, I was only able to get a continuous peak of 6.67kW. After looking back at the design, I realized that the AC Power output was 6.67kW because the inverter’s max output is 290W/295W Max per inverter (the system uses one inverter per panel, so 290W x 23 panels). So, all the numbers presented were based on DC power output, although to compare apples to apples, you should compare to the AC power output. -What IES had to say about this? So IES tried to explain why they used the microinverters they use, which have a max AC Power output of 290W. This I already knew after doing my homework and not trusting the first thing I see on paper. Basically, the microinverter that can output more AC Power starts working at a bit higher voltage than the ones I got. This matters because when you don’t get too much sun, your system will produce a little bit of power. So to decide which inverter is best, you have to see the pros and cons. Anyways, this was not my question to them; my question was why their advertisement was misleading. To this concern, they tried to shift my attention to the annual production number presented in the initial contract, which was 11,382kWh. I was told that their program considers AC Power and other factors. Still, to those of you that know how solar energy production is calculated and to those who don’t, it is calculated based on 4hrs of direct sun per day in other words, Annual Production = Watts per panel * Number of panels * 4hrs * 7 days a week * 52 weeks. So, if we take my system in DC Power, Annual Production = 340W per panel * 23 panels * 4hrs * 7 days a week * 52 weeks in a year = 11,386kWh DC Annual Production…. If we take my system in AC Power, Annual Production = 290W per inverter * 23 inverters * 4hrs * 7 days a week * 52 weeks in a year = 9,712kWh AC Annual Production…. Now, why do I believe I was told to look at the Annual Production instead? Well, surprise, we are in Texas, and we get more than 4 hrs of direct sun. So yeah, I’ll get to that number eventually. -Would this have impacted my decision to go solar (or at least with IES)? Yes! As you can see, I know one or two things about solar and how the system works and, systems are overpriced everywhere. So, I would have put more thought into it before deciding. I just failed by trusting the numbers that I was given.
Attempted to do a $50K ground mounted installation. Project ultimately had to be canceled due inability to design a system to meet my requirements and timeline. If you're in the market for a standard roof top, grid-tied installation, you might consider IES. If you need anything custom, you might consider looking somewhere else.
Solar has been working great for 4.5 years. Have a leak in roof do to rodents. They had their techs have been out to investigate, and they paced a temporary fix over the leak until the roofers can make it out for a perminate fix. I would also recommend solar to all home owners for the monthly savings on electricity.
We are extremely pleased with our experience with IES. The whole process was seamless and efficient. Any questions we had throughout were answered immediately, there was constant communication through the process, and every person we dealt with was kind and helpful. We are really happy we chose IES. Thank you!
Write a review
Sign up
